Veldhoven Builds the Machine. Washington Decides Who Gets One.
No treaty governs extreme ultraviolet lithography. The most consequential technology policy on earth runs on licence applications filed in The Hague and on a paragraph of American regulation that reaches six thousand kilometres to enforce them.
Veldhoven has roughly 45,000 residents and one company with more than 44,000 employees, which tells you almost everything about the place. ASML shipped 300 new lithography systems from there last year and booked 32.7 billion euros in sales, and of those 300 machines the ones that settle the argument number in the dozens. They print the finest features on every advanced processor in the world, they are built nowhere else, and the queue for one runs to 38.8 billion euros of backlog.
Markets have decided that the place the chip supply chain could break is Taiwan, and that concentration is real enough. But the leverage in this industry does not sit on the island. It sits one step upstream in a Dutch factory town, and in a clause of American export law that reaches inside it, and Washington understood that several years before anybody's risk model did.
1. ASML sold 300 machines last year, and the ones that matter come from one building
An extreme ultraviolet machine works by firing a laser at a droplet of molten tin about fifty thousand times a second, twice per droplet, blowing it into a plasma that radiates light at 13.5 nanometres. Almost everything absorbs light at that wavelength, including glass and air, so there are no lenses. The pattern bounces off a stack of mirrors polished so precisely that if one were scaled up to the size of Germany its largest bump would be under a millimetre, all of it inside a vacuum, in a machine the length of a bus with well over 100,000 parts in it.
Trade estimates put a standard EUV system somewhere around 200 million euros and the newer High NA tools at three to four hundred million. ASML's fourth quarter last year was a record in part because revenue for two High NA systems landed in it. Two. None of this is defended by a patent that will eventually expire: Nikon and Canon are free to try, and the reason they have not is that ASML spent two decades and a great deal of other people's money making EUV work, to the point where in 2012 Intel, Samsung and TSMC bought equity stakes to fund development of the machine they would later have to queue for. A monopoly assembled out of a supply chain rather than a patent is an awkward thing for a competition authority to think about, because there is nothing to license around and no second source to encourage. What is the policy for a chokepoint nobody designed?
2. Washington controls a Dutch machine through a clause about American parts
The instrument is the Foreign Direct Product Rule, the most far-reaching thing in the American export control toolkit and one almost nobody outside compliance departments has read. In outline it says that a foreign-made item falls under US jurisdiction if it is the direct product of American technology or software, or if it was made by a plant whose major components are. A chip designed with American tools and printed on a machine full of American subsystems is, legally speaking, an American export, whatever passport its makers hold.
On 2 December 2024 the Bureau of Industry and Security applied that logic to the machines themselves. The package added controls on 24 types of semiconductor manufacturing equipment and three categories of software, put 140 more names on the Entity List, and created two new product rules claiming jurisdiction over foreign-built equipment headed for China. The sentence to read twice is the de minimis provision that came with them: jurisdiction extends to specified foreign-produced equipment containing any amount of US-origin integrated circuits. No threshold, no percentage. The same package clarified that the rules also cover software keys, the strings that renew a licence and keep a tool legal to run.
"A tariff is trade policy. This is a claim of jurisdiction over other people's factories, and it holds only for as long as every complex machine on earth has an American chip inside it."
3. The Hague and Tokyo signed up in 2023, and the service contract did the real work
Extraterritorial rules still need someone local willing to enforce them, which is why January 2023 mattered more than any single American regulation. The Netherlands and Japan agreed to align their controls with Washington's, Japan's trade ministry putting six categories of chipmaking equipment under licence, covering cleaning, deposition, lithography and etching. The Dutch later required ASML to apply for licences to sell its 1970i and 1980i immersion systems to Chinese customers, tools a tier below EUV and perfectly capable of advanced work given enough patience.
The clause that actually bites is the quiet one underneath. ASML also needs a licence to service restricted machines it has already delivered, to supply spare parts for them, and to push software updates. A lithography tool is not a purchase, it is a subscription. It wants calibration, replacement optics, source modules and a standing team of engineers, and deprived of those it degrades from a machine into an expensive room. Blocking new sales slows a fab down over three years. Withdrawing the service contract slows it down this quarter. So which of those two is the sanction, and which is the press release?
4. SMIC printed a 7nm chip on the tools it was allowed to buy
The obvious retort to all of this arrived from Shanghai. SMIC reached a 7nm-class node without any EUV at all, using multipatterning: expose the wafer repeatedly with older deep ultraviolet machines, with self-aligned quadruple patterning on the tightest metal layers, so that one EUV pass becomes four DUV passes plus the deposition and etch steps in between. It works. Huawei's flagship processors run on it, and a domestic AI accelerator line is being built on top of it.
It also costs. More masks, more machine hours, more chances for a defect, and reported yields on the node that sit well below what a healthy leading-edge line would tolerate. Huawei's newest chips remain on that 7nm-class process while TSMC is shipping at 2nm, three to four generations ahead. And when the domestic line is not good enough there is the other route: CSIS reports that Huawei used shell companies to get TSMC to manufacture roughly two million chiplets for its Ascend AI processors before anyone noticed. Equipment controls are the strong version of this policy precisely because a lithography machine is heavy, arrives in crates, needs a foreign team to install and cannot be carried through customs in a bag. Chips can. What the controls actually bought was a price: a worse node, a lower yield, a longer wait, a permanent tax on every advanced Chinese processor. A price is not a wall, and prices come down.
5. Beijing answered with gallium, where it refines 98 percent of the world's supply
China's reply did not come through machines, because it has none to withhold. It came through the periodic table. Export licensing on gallium and germanium arrived in August 2023, hardened into an outright prohibition on shipments to the United States in December 2024, and was joined by successive rounds of rare earth controls through 2025 before most of it was suspended for a year following the Busan meeting last autumn. The suspension is the point: it expires.
The US Geological Survey puts China at about 99 percent of world primary low-purity gallium production and 98 percent of refined output, against American import reliance of 100 percent and a single company in New York recovering high-purity metal from imported material and scrap. Gallium is not an exotic curiosity. It goes into the compound semiconductors inside radar, satellite links, electronic warfare kit and fast-charging power electronics, which is to say the defence hardware the export controls exist to protect. The sanctions report argued that weaponising the payment system teaches everyone to need it less, and the same logic runs here with the polarity reversed. America found a chokepoint in machines, China found one in geology, and each has now shown the other precisely which dependency to spend the next decade engineering away. See how sanctions actually move money for the version of this argument that plays out in dollars.
Everyone is watching the wrong concentration
Taiwan is where the risk premium lives, and on most counts the island prints something close to nine tenths of the world's leading-edge logic. That is a capacity problem, and capacity is the kind of problem money eventually solves. Arizona, Kumamoto and Dresden are all slow and expensive answers to it, but they are answers, and a decade of subsidy will produce fabs that work.
Veldhoven is a capability problem, and capability took twenty years plus three customers willing to finance a machine that did not yet exist. Gallium is a geology and refining problem, which is harder again, since a refinery is cheap next to a lithography programme but nobody wants one built near them. Rank those three by how long a substitute takes and the island comes last, yet it carries nearly all of the market's attention, because an island is legible in a way that a Dutch clean room and a Chinese smelter are not.
The controls bought time, and they plainly did slow China down. Four years in, the honest question is not whether they worked but what the time was being spent on, because both sides are now funding the escape route from the other's grip with public money and a straight face. Who gets out first: the country building a lithography industry from nothing, or the countries building refineries?
Selected sources
- ASML: fourth-quarter and full-year 2025 results, January 2026
- Bureau of Industry and Security: Commerce strengthens export controls on advanced semiconductors, December 2024
- Bureau of Industry and Security: the Foreign-Produced Direct Product rule as it relates to the Entity List
- CSIS: the limits of chip export controls in meeting the China challenge
- CSIS: the true impact of allied export controls on the US and Chinese semiconductor equipment industries
- US Geological Survey: Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, gallium